.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}
|
|
|
Monday, February 13, 2006 Perhaps the bloggers for Hughes browse the net at different times of the day but whatever I would welcome their input into what so far appears to be a very one sided debate. Tag Lib Dems Labels: Lib Dems, UK Politics |
Ramblings on Politics, Football and Harley Davidsons About Me
I was first elected as a Liberal Democrat councillor in 1992 and was re-elected on three further occasions before standing down in 2003. I was Chair of Newbury Constituency during the by-election in 1993. I have stood for Parliament at each of the last three elections.
![]()
Choose Bennetts for Motorbike Insurance onlineRAC offer Breakdown Cover for Bikes Plan to live fast and die young? Then make sure you have Life Insurance!
![]()
![]()
|
8 Comments:
Tony,
I will get back to you after work. I have seen you're original post but cannot give it due attention until I return from work, if that is OK with you. Obviously the Huhne bloggers either have jobs that are less labour intensive or employeers who care less what they do during their work time.
Excellent - quick and witty response - look forward to seeing your thoughts later. No doubt the Huhne bloggers will just maintain that they are able to multitask
Fortunatley I was on a break just now.
My advice is here.
We can indeed walk and chew gum at the same time. Can Simon?
Thanks Peter - sadly I have already ruled out Ming. You make some good positive points for Ming but I was not impressed by his performance over the "Kennedy Assassination Question" nor by his ducking it on Question Time nor by his performance at Slough on Saturday. I also do not wish to spend the next five years discussing when Ming will hand over and who will inherit the crown
Tony
Who did impress you over the Kennedy issue? We get a distorted view from outside parliament - if we knew everything it might very well lead us to say that it HAS to be Ming.
And no leader is forever.
I agree that no leader is forever and I also agree that our view can be distorted by the media. However, I understand that this is not the first time that the Mingistas have tried a putsch. Even if it wasn't then I wish he had answered the question - what happened and why and what Mings role was and that of his supporters - I don't think that anyone in particular came out smelling of roses but those in the parliamentary party who supported Charles in 1999 and knew his problems have a special responsibility
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home