Wednesday, May 31, 2006
Prescott to give up Dorneywood
The game is up in Iraq
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Once you are the story it is time to go
Sunday, May 28, 2006
The Jowell Mills saga continues
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
Thaksin to return
Monday, May 22, 2006
Gutted
Friday, May 19, 2006
An interlude will now occur
The BBC Preview can be found here
But for a Leeds view you cannot beat Leeds United Life
For Leeds United Life view of the Leeds Team Selection click here
or for the Leeds United Life view of the Watford Team Selection click here
We are Leeds, We are Leeds We are Leeds
We are Leeds, We are Leeds We are Lee-eeds
We are Leeds, We are Leeds We are Leeds
We are Lee-eeds WE ARE LEEDS
Thursday, May 18, 2006
Mixed messages on energy
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Thailand - more poll chaos
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
His and Hers Fatboys
Monday, May 15, 2006
The English don't want a Scottish PM
Thailand praised for response to bird flu
Sunday, May 14, 2006
Give the guy a chance
Saturday, May 13, 2006
Email received, credit card debited
Cardiff here we come
Super, super Leeds,
Super, super Leeds,
Super, super Leeds,
Super Leeds United
Friday, May 12, 2006
Leeds to take part in most lucrative game in world football
The figures are made up as follows :
- Share of Sky Revenue £9,000,000
- Overseas TV revenue £6,500,000
- Live matches £1,750,000 (say 5 at £350,000 each)
- Central Sponsorship £500,000
- Locally negotiated sponsorship £2,000,000
- Gate Receipts £9,660,000 (say a 12,000 increase to 35,000 at £35/person say 19 league games + 4 cup)
- Other £4,000,000 (perimeter advertising, merchandising and merit payments £475,000 per place)
- Parachute Payments £14,400,000 (over following 2 seasons if relegated)
Grand Total 47,810,000
And this is if the promoted club is relegated back to the championship the following season. If not then the parachute payments will not be payable but according to The Observer the clubs share of TV money will rise to £28m a season from 2007/08 onwards. Of course this also means that next years play off final will be worth a further £19m valuing this one off game at over £66m!!
We are Leeds, We are Leeds We are Leeds
We are Leeds, We are Leeds We are Lee-eeds
We are Leeds, We are Leeds We are Leeds
We are Lee-eeds WE ARE LEEDS
Thursday, May 11, 2006
Shambles at Elland Road as fans rush for tickets
A few small suggestions for the club should they be faced with a similar situation in the future.
1. Offer season ticket holders priority (I am not one) they deserve it
2. Don't offer season ticket holders 2 tickets
3. If you decide not to do 2 then do 1 and then do 4
4. Offer members 2nd priority after the initial period for season ticket holders
5. Finally if and only if there are other tickets left after season ticket holders and members then open sales up to the general public.
6. Do not under any circumstances allow people who are not a) season ticket holders or b) members to join as new members on the first day of sales and then promptly sell them play off tickets!
7. Open up the phones lines so that people can buy tickets that way. (Incidentally this also saves the environment from people like me who making 400 mile round trips)
8. Use internet sales - again saves the environment
9. Put on extra ticket office staff when you know you are going to have a rush
10. Don't put one thing on your website and then do something else
11. Communicate openly and honestly with the fans (For instance in each sales period explain how many tickets you have left and how many people fall into the relevant categories)
12. If you do put statements on your website which effectively say its every man jack for himself and its first come first served then do not be surprised when the world and his wife turns up.
Oh and incidentally the upshot of my attempt to buy tickets was that I have left completed postal applications which I have been assured will be fulfilled. Ho hum
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
Thai court acts to resolve position of Election Commission
Tag Thailand
Tuesday, May 09, 2006
Local Election Analysis Part 2
The Liberal Democrats
Beat Labour in the national vote with a 27% share. This is a 22% (or 5 percentage point) improvement on their share of the vote at the general election in 2005. This is only the second time that the Liberal Democrats have been ahead of Labour on that measure. A remarkable achievement for a party written off just a month ago.
The Liberal Democrats gained Richmond council from the Tories – winning a staggering 17 seats from them. The Liberal Democrats now have twice as many councillors as the Conservatives who used to run the council before the election!
The Liberal Democrats gained control of St Albans with 31 seats against the Tories’ 18.
The Liberal Democrats gained control of South Lakeland gaining 9 councillors while the Conservatives lost 2. The Liberal Democrats now have 31 councillors against the Tories’ 18.
The Liberal Democrats gained four seats in Waltham Forest, overtaking the Conservatives to become the second party on the council, which remains under no overall control. The Conservatives lost 3 seats in this London Borough.
The Conservatives still do not have a single seat in Gateshead, while the Liberal Democrats won a seat off Labour to consolidate their position as the second largest party on the council.
The Conservatives still do not have a single seat in Knowsley, where the Liberal Democrats gained a seat off Labour.
Lib Dem gains in Brent were very impressive, Lib Dems taking 13 from Labour and 3 from the Conservatives to become the council's largest party there.
Liberal Democrat gains from Conservatives resulted in the Conservatives losing control of Harrogate and West Lindsey (Lincolnshire).
And the Conservatives lost their last seat on Cambridge Council, with the city joining Liverpool, Manchester, Sheffield, Oxford and others as Tory-free zones.
Lib Dem Chris Maines moves the party up to second place in the Lewisham Mayoral contest, beating the Conservative candidate.
Four Lib Dem gains in Gosport took away the Conservatives' majority there.
The Liberal Democrats held Sutton against a strong Conservative challenge.
The Lib Dems won 3 seats on Woking to become the largest party on the council, while the Conservatives are only in second place.
The Lib Dems gained three seats off the Conservatives in Worthing.
The Lib Dems remain the largest party in Bristol, where they gained a seat. The Lib Dems have more than two and a half times as many councillors as the Conservatives in Bristol.
The Lib Dems gained two seats in North East Lincolnshire, overtaking the Tories to become the largest party.
The Liberal Democrats outpolled Labour in Haringey in terms of votes cast, although narrowly (30-27) fail to take control of the council from Labour. There were 11 gains for Lib Dems from Labour. The Conservatives still do not have a single councillor in Haringey.
Lib Dems made 10 gains in Lewisham, south London, depriving Labour of overall control of the council. The Conservatives only have a measly three seats here.
Three Lib Dem gains from Labour in Oldham remove Labour's majority. The BNP fail to win a seat on the council, which they had targeted. The Conservatives lost a seat so that they only have one remaining seat in the town where Winston Churchill was the MP.
The Lib Dems also won half the seats in Rochdale, narrowly missing out on overall control. The Lib Dems now have three times as many seats as the Conservatives in Rochdale.
In Salford, the Lib Dems gained two seats. The Conservatives failed to gain a single seat and have lost their straight second place on the council.
The Lib Dems gained a seat in Solihull where the Conservatives failed to gain a single seat.
The Lib Dems gained a seat in St Helens where they now have more than three times as many seats as the Conservatives.
The Conservatives failed to win a single seat in Stockport where the Lib Dems remain in control with more than three times as many seats as the Conservatives.
Despite David Cameron holding up Trafford as a shining Conservative success, the Tories actually lost a seat to the Lib Dems on this council.
The Conservatives came a cropper in Walsall where they lost two seats to Labour.
Despite David Cameron holding up Wigan as an example of Conservative greatness, they are only narrowly the second party there with only one more seat than the Liberal Democrats.
The Conservatives made no gains in the Wirral, while the Liberal Democrats gained a seat.
In Camden there were 13 gains for the Lib Dems, making them the largest party with 20 councillors to Labour's 18. The Tories are a distant third.
Kingston-upon-Thames was held by the Lib Dems, restoring the three council 'band of gold' in south and south-west London with Sutton and Richmond.
The Lib Dems retained control of Islington on the mayor’s casting vote.
The Liberal Democrats retained control of Cambridge, Eastleigh, Liverpool, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Pendle, Stockport, Sutton, Three Rivers and Watford
The Lib Dems still have nearly twice as many councillors in Liverpool as Labour, in this, Labour’s former traditional heartland.
Dorothy Thornhill retains the mayoralty in Watford. Dorothy became the first Lib Dem directly elected mayor four years ago, and this time gained more than half of all votes cast to retain the post.
Good news for Lib Dems from two university cities. The party hold Cambridge and overtake Labour to become the largest party in Oxford, for the first time ever.
There were 2 Lib Dem gains in Jack Straw's Blackburn council which would have removed Labour's overall majority but for the recent defection of an independent councillor to Labour.
There were four Lib Dem gains in Warrington which deprived Labour of control of the council.
Lib Dems have held Stockport and gained St Albans. The latter was previously run on the chairman's casting vote - now Lib Dems have a majority of four.
Lib Dems have increased their majority on Newcastle-upon-Tyne Council to 18 seats. Lib Dems have also increased their majority in Three Rivers Council in Hertfordshire, as well as holding neighbouring Watford.
Four gains for the Lib Dems in Derby deprive Labour of their majority on the council. The Lib Dems have a third more seats than the Tories here.
Lib Dems have held Pendle Council in Lancashire, retaining a majority of 11. Also in the north west, Lib Dems have gained three seats on Rochdale, giving the party exactly half the councillors on the authority.
The Lib Dems are now the largest party on John Prescott's local council, Hull, having made four gains to overtake Labour.
The Lib Dems won a seat in the heart of Labour territory in Reading.
The Lib Dems won a seat on North Tyneside council.
Monday, May 08, 2006
We are Leeds, We are Leeds, We are Leeds
We're Leeds - and we're proud of it!
We're LEEDS - and we're proud of it!
We're Leeds - and we're proud of it,
We're Leeds and we're proud of it...
Thailand - elections annulled
Local Election Analysis Part 1
The Conservatives
Their national share of the vote was only two percentage points more than that achieved when Michael Howard led the party in 2004, which was followed one year later by the Conservatives losing the general election with 158 seats less than Labour.
The BBC’s Nick Robinson, himself a former Conservative, has said that there is no truth in the assumption that the Conservative party have demonstrated a broadening of their appeal. He explains that they have merely consolidated in their heartlands in the South, with no reaching out to broader areas of voters. Robinson says that “Traditional Conservative voters are simply no longer embarrassed to vote for their party.”
Robinson’s interpretation is borne out by the BBC’s estimate that the Conservatives had a swing of 4% to them across the South, but they remained static in terms of votes cast across the north of England.
This lack of even the beginnings of a breakthrough is further supported by the fact that there is still not a single Conservative councillor in Manchester, Liverpool or Newcastle. The Conservatives made no gains in Sheffield where they have only two councillors. The Liberal Democrats have 36 councillors on Sheffield City Council, as well as 38 in Manchester, 47 in Newcastle and 59 in Liverpool. The Conservatives have only 2 councillors in Hull, where the Liberal Democrats have 22.
It is remarkable that there were no Conservative councillors elected in Liverpool, bearing mind that David Cameron took his whole shadow cabinet there shortly before the elections, amidst much publicity. Likewise, the Tories held their Spring Conference in Manchester, with an identical flat-lining amongst their public support there.
There are also no Conservative councillors in Oxford.
The Conservatives lost their last councillor on Cambridge City Council, so that there are now no Conservative councillors in our two great University cities.
In London, most of the Conservative gains were in West London, traditional Conservative territory – not in the East of the capital, where the Liberal Democrats did very well.
Sunday, May 07, 2006
Thailand chaos continues
Saturday, May 06, 2006
Leeds vs Preston - still all to play for
Friday, May 05, 2006
Cheaper Fuel Prices? Maybe
Thursday, May 04, 2006
Government tables changes to abolition of Parliament Bill
Wednesday, May 03, 2006
There is no plan B
Tuesday, May 02, 2006
Lead needed for people to live a greener lifestyle
I will admit that I have never heard of the Sustainable Consumption Roundtable. Apparently it is a joint initiative between the Sustainable Development Commission and the National Consumer Council and has been funded by Defra and the DTI.
Anyway they have produced a report entitled "I Will If You Will" which recommends that the government needs to take the lead if significant progress is to be made. It also concludes that people are generally happy with measures which bring positive environmental benefits as long as those measures are applied fairly. They also specifically recommend two things which I have banged on about here before namely;
- Making on-site energy generation common in homes and public buildings
- Rolling out "smart" meters to raise awareness of energy consumption
Monday, May 01, 2006
Learning Disabilities, Relationships and Sex
The whole issue of sex and relationships for those with disabilities is a difficult one.
Those with a disability have just as much right to happy and loving relationships and sexual experiences as the rest of the population.
Of course in practice this is often not the way it turns out. Their disability can get in the way both in terms of how others see them and in more practical ways as well.
Added to this is the issue of how those who care for those with a disability feel about getting involved in facilitating such relationships particularly where they may be sexual in nature.
The issues I have outlined above become even more complex when the person concerned has a learning disability.
A few interesting points come to mind
- The majority of women with a learning disability have sex standing up. Why? Because the opportunities to have a sexual relationship in "normal" surroundings do not exist and liaisons have to be snatched as and when they can.
- Masturbation is a big issue for those dealing with teenagers with a learning disability. Pretending otherwise will not make the problem go away.
- There are examples of couples who have been "going out" with each other for years and yet neither has visited the other ones home. Why? Because the carers or the system will not enable to happen.
Sometimes they may suffer from physical disabilities as well but the key issue becomes one of consent. Obviously where people are vulnerable we need to ensure that they are protected from abuse and abusers. The important thing is can the person understand the issues involved and can they be helped to make informed choices?
However, just as importantly can we as a society accept that they have a right to happy relationships and a fulfilled sex life just as much as anyone else. Can we find ways to help them to make informed choices and enable them to act upon these choices once they have made them?
So what needs to be done?
1. The issue needs to be talked about. People with learning disabilities and those who care for them and support them and work with them need to discuss this issue. We need to gain a better understanding of the issues involved and the current state of play with regard to various areas which may have an impact as this issue is taken forward such as the law and current research
2. Information and Training needs to be designed and made available. This needs to be aimed at both those with learning disabilities and those who care for them be they parents, carers or those involved through charities and social services. This information should help those with a learning disability to make informed choices and support their carers or parents in helping them to act on the basis of those informed choices
3. Research needs to be done. Admittedly I am not sure what has already been done in this area. However a number of bodies could get together and pool current knowledge / research before deciding what gaps need to be filled. I would like to see some specific research on the benefits of long term relationships and the benefits of a healthy sex life to those with a learning disability. I would hypothesise that those who were enjoying a healthy sex life and /or were in long term relationships would find a number of benefits to their life. I suspect that their health would be better; I suspect that they would be happier; I suspect that they would require less medication and I suspect that they would be more able to partake in other activities.
4. Campaigning may be needed to ensure that the research is funded, to ensure that legislation is changed and ultimately to ensure that appropriate resources are made available to ensure that those with a learning disability have an equal chance of forming happy and healthy relationships
This is undoubtedly a very difficult area but just because it is does not mean that it should not be tackled.